Judging International Judgments Anew? The Human Rights Courts before Domestic Courts
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Mental health courts – a human rights perspective
This presentation analyzes specialised mental health courts (MHCs), as one solution to the long-standing, growing challenge of dealing fairly and justly with persons with mental illness (PMIs) coming before the criminal justice system, from a human rights (HR) perspective. MHCs have garnered professional and political support in North America. Redefining their primary purpose from the determina...
متن کاملthe comparing between supervisory bodies of human rights interpretations and international criminal courts judgments on provisional release
nuremberg and tokyo courts as first international criminal courts were established by allies when there were not international regulations regarding the accused rights. but post war, effective steps were taken in this regard. at global and regional levels, a variety of documents have noted this matter detailed and also measures have been considered such as human rights committee of united natio...
متن کاملWhen Courts Collide: Integrated Domestic Violence Courts and Court Pluralism
This Article proposes court pluralism as a new theory for analyzing the role of the justice system in addressing domestic violence. It argues that a systemic view of the justice system is essential to developing coherent reform strategies, and lays out the foundation for taking into account the unique functions of civil and criminal justice in domestic violence cases. In doing so, the Article c...
متن کاملDRUG COURTS – LESSONS FROM THE UK AND BEYOND Gill McIvor THE INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT OF DRUG COURTS
Drug courts were established initially in the United States in the late 1980s, initiated by sentencers who were frustrated at the limited range and effectiveness of existing criminal justice measures for dealing with drug-related crime. The first drug court was introduced in Dade County, Florida in 1989. The impetus for the establishment of drug courts in North America came from a growing ackno...
متن کاملBorrowing and non-Borrowing among International Courts
Why do some international courts and judges extensively borrow from other international courts while others do not? Answers to this question have important implications for debates on transjudicial communication, the diffusion of international legal norms, and international judicial behavior. Judges may use external sources because they help improve decisions or because it fits their ideologica...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: European Journal of International Law
سال: 2019
ISSN: 0938-5428,1464-3596
DOI: 10.1093/ejil/chz063